Fluent at the Job But Not the Language (And What That Means) 4/9
Professional identity, workplace Japanese, and the cost of feeling like a fool when you know you are not one.
Language Learning Meets Real Life is a research‑informed series about how relationships, identity, and the texture of everyday life shape the way adults actually learn languages. New posts are published bimonthly on The Language Ladder.
I didn’t get my job through sheer luck, though it can honestly look that way from the outside, with me being at the right at the right place at the right time. My superintendent had seen my lessons and liked the output of projects I’d been given while working at the board of education. So, he advocated for me to have a more significant role within our city’s schools, pushing for my licensing and full integration.
Now, I felt unsure about it and stressed that my Japanese was practically non-existent. They assured me I’d be okay (read as: maybe literally fooled me). It took a few crazy years adapting to my role, but I eventually achieved it. Back then, I didn’t fully grasp that I’d be taking on the duties of a Japanese teacher, not just those of a foreigner in a Japanese school. That’s when I was surprised by how stark the difference actually was.
When I started using Japanese at work, things changed beccause colleagues started helping more and students also became friendlier. I could explain the why behind the what. With Japanese, I could hold students to a higher standard because I could actually communicate what that standard was, and I could hold my own in the staff room instead of being managed around. When I think about it, I didn’t learn the language to get my job. I learned it for the job I actually ended up having.
The Colleague I Think About
Right now, I work alongside someone who reminds me of where I started. She comes from the same background, has the same job context, but barely knows any Japanese. She’s aware of how it reads at work, that she’s treated warmly but not quite as a full member of the teaching staff. That there are even conversations where she’s worked around rather than included in.
Despite that, she’s also made a conscious choice not to learn. This situation works for her as it is. The need that would drive the learning simply isn’t present, and without that need, no amount of good intention will produce the habit.
Most workplaces have someone like this. The person who never learned the new software, never got the certification, never picked up the tool everyone else eventually did, not because they couldn’t, but because it wasn’t a requirement and nothing but that will ever really will them to.
I don’t tell this story to make her a cautionary tale. She’s an example of something the first post in this series: motivation has to come from an actual place. If the pressure isn’t there, the learning won’t be.
But watching from the inside of the same workplace, I don’t think either of us got it wrong. We’re just answering different questions at different points in our lives.
Sounding Less Than We Are
Working in a second language can make communication more difficult, less precise, and less reflective of who we really are. For instance, I’m aware of my intelligence and competence English. With Japanese, I frequently experience moments at work where I feel stupid, can't express myself, lose my train of thought, and end up speaking vaguely. My functional Japanese sentences are often indirect and sometimes don’t fully express what I mean.
The study of multilingualism and professional identity can explain this situation. A common issue for professionals operating in a second language is the discrepancy between their perceived and actual competence, where their language skills are prioritized over their expertise in evaluation, as noted by Kameda (2005).
I feel this the most with seitou shidou (student discipline). Balancing support and correction for a child is tricky, and it is hard enough to do in our native language. In Japanese, where I’m still calibrating register and tone, I seem to overshoot in either more than I’d like. At times, I have been too soft when firmness was necessary and too blunt when warmth would have been more effective. I still can’t precisely put into words what I really want to say when I am mad or annoyed at a kid, and I’m working on that.
The Language We Actually Learn Is Narrower Than We Think
Another surprising discovery from my few years working with Japanese was that expertise in the job didn't automatically translate to comprehensive Japanese language ability. It’s a representation of a particular, often diligently gained skill set essential for a job, which is very different from knowledge gained simply for its own sake.
If you've learned anything for your job, you're probably already familiar with this. Your mastery of company-specific software holds no value when you switch careers or move to a job with a completely different platform. You get good at the version of a skill your role demands, in the situation your role puts you in .
For instance, I could run an English-subject meeting, write a specific report, and step into a discipline conversation without having to think about it anymore. But put me in a conversation with very little or no professional frame around it, like random conversations you find at a friend's dinner, the fluency I'd built for work won’t always carry over. I'd need clarifying questions constantly, in a way I just don’t really do at school anymore.
This aligns with studies on specialized languages, but I’ve found that the trend is not exclusive to linguistics. Douglas (2000) suggests that language ability for specific purposes is cultivated by the content and demands of a specific field, rather than by general fluency. Skill in one professional register does not automatically translate to other areas. Dudley-Evans and St John (1998) also observed a similar phenomenon in English for Specific Purposes, where students in specialized fields gain genuine, practical abilities within their area, along with language structures they were never instructed on.
So, “I can do my job in Japanese” and “I’m fluent in Japanese” are completely different claims, and it’s worth not comparing them to each other, not because one is lesser, but because they’re measuring different things. Anyone who’s ever been an expert at work and then suddenly beginner (like when changing roles or careers) already knows the difference.
The Input-Interaction Gap
Now, one common frustration for workplace language learners in office-based or document-heavy roles is encountering far more language than what they get to actually use. For example, many professional settings require a lot of input and analysis. Some of our tasks involve reading emails, reports, meeting agendas, and other formal documents to analyze. We may process an enormous volume of written words. But when it comes to actual conversation, the spontaneous, have-to-respond-now kind of interaction, is rarer.
Consistent research shows that input alone is just isn’t enough. Of course, comprehensible input creates the conditions for acquisition, but interaction is really what drives it forward (Long, 1996). Obviously, reading emails all day builds reading ability. We may eventually feel confident with this but it won’t build the capacity to hold a meeting or discipline a student, or negotiate a deadline out loud in real time.
The reality is that some workplace learners are often surrounded by the language but do not practice it enough, causing their progress to stall. It's the same phenomenon that causes people to freeze when using a new work system live, despite thorough preparation and no lookup time. The fact is that no amount of theoretical knowledge about a skill can replace the practice of executing it under pressure.
Professional Identity and the Language It Was Built On
Unsurprisingly, the language we use at work shapes our professional identity (Norton, 1997). I know I’ve behaved differently in American and Japanese workplaces, and research backs that up: our ability to behave professionally, gauge a situation, and give feedback without causing offense is closely tied to language. Or course, isn’t entirely determined by it, but the feeling of being capable and in charge at work is tied to the specific language we use to define it.
Unfortunately, the authority, voice, and confident projection we’ve honed over years in our native language aren’t skills that automatically carry over. I used to see a seasoned doctor who was both funny and knowledgeable but would always morph into a self-conscious person whenever he would try to reexplain things in English. It didn’t stop him from trying but the Jekyll and Hyde difference was stark.
Experiencing this is standard when working with different languages, not a reflection of your individual capability. Nevertheless, the inability to articulate what you know you want to say in the required language can be frustrating. The reframe that actually helps isn't your language will get better. It's you're not bad at your job. Your language skills are just catching up.
Good Enough for Work vs. Good Enough for Us
At some point, most workplace learners arrive at a version of the same question: Is this good enough?
If the work is being completed successfully, relationships with colleagues are functioning well, and their language skills meet most of the demands of an ordinary day, is that a point at which further improvement becomes a choice rather than a necessity?
To respond to this, I think we need to think about our career aspirations, both now and in the future. The truth is “good enough” language is a limit, not a launching point, and staying there is a perfectly legitimate choice if we’re okay with it. But if the current situation isn’t working and the cost of pushing further feels like there’ll be a bigger payoff that's a real calculation, to consider. If there's a version of our professional life that requires more responsibility, more depth with colleagues, students, or clients, than the current language can reach, then adequate isn't actually adequate. The important thing is knowing which one is true for us.
Back to my colleague, I don't think she's made the wrong choice. I think she's made an honest one for where she wants to be, and I know I am better for having expanded my role. If you are using a second language for your job, where do you currently stand?
What to Expect Next
For the next installment, we're looking at one of the most underwritten contexts in language learning: doing it while parenting. While it’s not something I have personal experience with, it's a situation I see constantly in language-learning communities, parents raising bilingual kids alongside their own learning, or trying to keep pace with children who are outpacing them in a language they're still developing. I feel like it’s worth researching about even with my inexperience. Parenting changes everything about time, energy, and what even counts as progress.
📌 This post is part of Language Learning Meets Real Life. Over the coming posts, we’ll look at these contexts one by one: learning for a partner, for heritage, for work, for our kids, for a new home, or for the pull of a book or film we want without a layer of translation. Our lives impact our learning uniquely, something apps and textbooks can’t fully represent.
If you enjoyed this, a restack or share helps it reach someone who might need it today. And if you’d like to support this newsletter, you can always treat me to a rice cracker over at Buy Me a Coffee. It helps more than you know. 💛
Waddle on. 🐧
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Kameda, N. (2005). The significance of English as a business lingua franca in Japanese corporations. Journal of Language for International Business, 16(2), 46–58.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Yoshida, H. (1930). Morning at Abuto (Abuto no asa), from the series Inland Sea (Seto naikai) [Woodblock print]. JP Woodblocks. https://jpwoodblocks.com/hiroshi_yoshida/morning-at-abuto-abuto-no-asa-from-the-series-inland-sea-seto-naikai/